Moral Considerations
All of the ethical circumstances were secured, according to the recommendations from Solution No. of Ministry off Fitness. Its perform is actually authorized by the Stability and Browse Chamber out of the new Centro de- Filosofia age Ciencias Humanas of Universidade Government create Rio de- Janeiro (UFRJ) (CAAE No. 03490118.8. and you will Protocol Zero. step 3.). On first page of your own on the web survey, there was this new 100 % free and Informed Agree Title (FICT), and that demonstrated information about the risks and you can advantages of answering new analysis, plus the ensure off withdrawal away from consent, as opposed to bias and at any time. Solely those people just who looked the latest consent solution had the means to access the study posts. People who did not check the concur choice was indeed rerouted so you can the conclusion new questionnaire.
To analyze you can easily differences in PCM and you can NCM, according to sociodemographic variables: sex, community, care of younger sisters, exposure or absence of someone, and achieving or otherwise not having college students, evaluations between groups were made by using the Mann-Whitney U decide to try ( Dining table step 1).
In the 1st, the connection between PCM and you will NCM is actually analyzed also it try learned that PCM (M = ; DP = ) correlates negatively into NCM (M = ; DP = ); p =
Statistically significant differences with small effect sizes were found in PCM in three categories tested: occupation (U = 37; p = .035; PS est = .47), presence/absence of partner (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .29) and presence/absence of children (U = 21; p = .002; PS asianmelodies chat est = .44). It was observed that the participants who were unemployed (Mdn = ), who had one or more children (Mdn = ) and who were in a relationship (Mdn = ); had significantly higher levels of PCM than people who worked (Mdn = ), who had no children (Mdn = ) and who did not have a relationship (Mdn = ).
On the other hand, NCM indicated statistically significant differences with small effect sizes related to sex (U = 19; p = .000; PS est = .43) and the presence/absence of children (U = 10; p = .000; PS est = .34). It was observed that both women (Mdn = ) as for the participants who do not have children (Mdn = ) have significantly higher levels of NCM than men (Mdn = ) and participants with children (Mdn = ).
Based on the results obtained in the comparison between people who are or are not in a stable relationship, we tested the possible differences in PCM according to the type of relationship using the Kruskal Wallis test. 000). Mann-Whitney tests were used to follow up on this finding. A Bonferroni correction was applied and all effects were tested at the .02 level. PCM levels showed no differences between people who were dating and people who were married or in a stable union (U = 29; p = .039; PS est = .47). However, statistically significant differences were found in PCM levels between married and in a stable union (U = 5; p = .000; PS est = .41), of which married people (Mdn = ) had higher levels of PCM when compared to people who were in a stable union (Mdn = ).
One or two Spearman correlations have been conducted. 000; roentgen = -.494; r dos = .24. About 2nd data the newest dating ranging from PCM, NCM and you will 16 personal and you can contextual parameters had been examined and will get noticed for the Dining table 2. Poor associations was indeed receive both positive and negative anywhere between PCM or NCM and you may a dozen of your own variables looked at. Particularly the brand new sociodemographic details: “quantity of siblings” and “birth acquisition” while the character points: “conscientiousness” and you can “transparency to try out” exhibited zero significant correlations that have PCM and you can NCM.